<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>n3rd.org &#187; technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.n3rd.org/category/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.n3rd.org</link>
	<description>random thoughts on not-so-random things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:29:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The n3rkia E71</title>
		<link>http://www.n3rd.org/2009/04/30/the-n3rkia-e71/</link>
		<comments>http://www.n3rd.org/2009/04/30/the-n3rkia-e71/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>n3rd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n3rd.org/?p=1289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got myself a new cell phone! Yay for me! And I shall share my joy with you whether you like it or not. So shut up and listen.

The contract with my cell phone provider recently expired so seized the opportunity to pretend I needed a new phone. I made a short list of what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got myself a new cell phone! Yay for me! And I shall share my joy with you whether you like it or not. So shut up and listen.<br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1291 n3-post-img" title="e71" src="http://www.n3rd.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/e71.png" alt="e71" width="150" height="281" /></p>
<p>The contract with my cell phone provider recently expired so seized the opportunity to pretend I needed a new phone. I made a short list of what I wanted (namely WiFi, GPS, Symbian and a good, replaceable battery) and what wasn&#8217;t all that important (multimedia capabilities, camera and touchscreen) and the list of possible candidates quickly became <em>very</em> short.</p>
<p>I was fairly excited about the <a href="http://www.blackberry.com/blackberrystorm/">Blackberry Storm</a> when it was announced last September. Of course now we know that it didn&#8217;t really live up to all the expectations it initially raised, but even if it had done so, not having WiFi would still be an absolute no-go. The iPhone is a great piece of engineering, but the battery isn&#8217;t replaceable and I don&#8217;t agree with the overall concept Apple is pursuing with its App Store. The Android-powered phones (all two of them) are somewhat clunky and in my opinion not quite mature enough yet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll only comment on a few things instead of boring you with a lengthy in-depth review, there are plenty of them out there already, and I agree with them for the most part (take a look at <a href="http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/reviews/item/Nokia_E71.php">All About Symbian</a>, <a href="http://www.mobiletechreview.com/phones/Nokia-E71.htm">Mobile Tech Review</a> or <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/06/19/nokia-e71-review/">Engadget Mobile</a>). But truth be told, who really sold it to me was <a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2008/08/22.html">Joel Spolsky</a> &#8211; I trust that man :-)</p>
<h3 id="toc-synchronization">Synchronization</h3>
<p>I manage all my contacts and appointments using <a href="http://www.zimbra.com/">Zimbra</a>, so seamless synchronization was mandatory. Turns out that Nokia&#8217;s <a href="http://www.mailforexchange.com/">Mail for Exchange</a> does exactly that. Just enter the URL and your login credentials and you&#8217;re all set, no need to manually synchronize with your PC.<br />
There&#8217;s also <a href="http://www.dataviz.com/products/roadsync/series60/index.html?device_id=474">RoadSync</a> which is more powerful but puts a 50$ deep dent in your pocket. If I ever switch to Exchange I might take another look at it. Until then, Mail For Exchange is just fine.</p>
<h3 id="toc-battery">Battery</h3>
<p>Now that&#8217;s a big one. I just hate having to recharge my cell phone every other day. The E71 easily lasts four or more days, and that&#8217;s including some semi-serious WiFi usage. Plus the battery is replaceable which is great. You can get a new one for as low as 20€, should need be.</p>
<h3 id="toc-keyboard">Keyboard</h3>
<p>As you can see in the picture, the E71 features a full QWERTY-keyboard which rather small keys. I was very skeptic as to how tedious typing on it would be. Turns out, it really is a breeze once you&#8217;ve gotten used to it. The positioning of the &#8216;ü&#8217; is somewhat awkward but that&#8217;s no biggie. I was very pleasantly surprised.</p>
<h3 id="toc-wifi-web">WiFi &#038; Web</h3>
<p>Unfortunately, the way the E71 handles WiFi connections isn&#8217;t terribly smart and you have to manually select the appropriate access point for each program each and every time you want to connect to the Internet. If, however, you can bring yourself to shelling out 10€ you can get <a href="http://connect.psiloc.com/">Psiloc Connect</a> which will take care of all of that hassle.<br />
The device comes with its own browser but I didn&#8217;t even look at it given that <a href="http://www.opera.com/mobile/">Opera Mobile</a> is indisputably the weapon of choice here. I have to admit that surfing with the iPhone is a lot more fun due to its touchscreen (and larger display). So if that&#8217;s a primary concern for you then you should probably go with the iPhone. I, however, am not planning on spending too much time on the web. All I usually do is look something up on Wikipedia, post on Facebook or read news. For that the navigating with the keyboard is perfectly fine.</p>
<p><br/><br />
All in all, the E71 is a truly great phone. The only thing one could complain about is the mediocre camera and possibly its multimedia capabilities (or lack thereof). Then again, it&#8217;s a business phone. And a good one at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n3rd.org/2009/04/30/the-n3rkia-e71/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making SetPoint and Foobar like each other</title>
		<link>http://www.n3rd.org/2009/01/26/making-setpoint-and-foobar-like-each-other/</link>
		<comments>http://www.n3rd.org/2009/01/26/making-setpoint-and-foobar-like-each-other/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>n3rd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n3rd.org/?p=852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It finally happened. After over 10 years of service I finally replaced my trusted old, greased-up keyboard with something a little more formidable: a shiny new Logitech Illuminated. It&#8217;s simple but elegant, ridiculously slim and, well, illuminated.
A fantastic piece of equipment. It feels great, somewhat like a notebook keyboard. What I particularly like is that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="float: right;" src="http://www.n3rd.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/logitech-illuminated.png" alt="Logitech Illuminated" title="Logitech Illuminated" width="300" height="193" class="n3-post-img alignnone size-full wp-image-851" />It finally happened. After over 10 years of service I finally replaced my trusted old, greased-up keyboard with something a little more formidable: a shiny new <a href="http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/keyboards/keyboard/devices/4740&#038;cl=US,EN">Logitech Illuminated</a>. It&#8217;s simple but elegant, ridiculously slim and, well, illuminated.<br />
A fantastic piece of equipment. It feels great, somewhat like a notebook keyboard. What I particularly like is that all the fancy &#8220;multimedia keys&#8221; are not separate but accessible through the F-keys and an <em>Fn</em> key (again, like on a notebook). Since I already have a Logitech mouse I didn&#8217;t even need to install any additional software. Unfortunately, the multimedia keys such as play/pause and next/previous track do not work with <a href="http://www.foobar2000.org/">foobar2000</a>. But after some digging through the web I found a solution. Fire up the text editor of your choice and open the <code>players.ini</code> in your SetPoint directory and add this line to the <code>[Players]</code> section (in one line):</p>
<pre class="n3_codebox">foobar2000=wac,foobar2000.exe,{97E27FAA-C0B3-4b8e-A693-ED7881E99FC1},
xxx,xxx,xxx,xxx,xxx,xxx,xxx,0,1,Foobar2000</pre>
<p>Et viola, foobar and SetPoint become best friends. This works for foobar 0.9.6.1 under Windows Vista x64 (thanks to Zebulon84 from the forum over at <a href="http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=4994&#038;st=125">HydrogenAudio</a>), it probably won&#8217;t work with versions prior to 0.9.5 or Windows XP.<br />
<br/><br />
<strong>Update:</strong> Law brought to my attention that the anti-spam <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAPTCHA">CAPTCHA</a> was broken for some unknown reason. It should work now, sorry for the inconvenience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n3rd.org/2009/01/26/making-setpoint-and-foobar-like-each-other/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adventures in fine driving</title>
		<link>http://www.n3rd.org/2009/01/22/adventures-in-fine-driving/</link>
		<comments>http://www.n3rd.org/2009/01/22/adventures-in-fine-driving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>n3rd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n3rd.org/?p=705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone loves driving. Some even to the point where they slow down in front of a green light just to prolong this joyous activity. Or maybe they are simply retarded and don&#8217;t know how to operate a motor vehicle properly.
Either way, for those who don&#8217;t own a car &#8211; or one that only goes a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone loves driving. Some even to the point where they slow down in front of a green light just to prolong this joyous activity. Or maybe they are simply retarded and don&#8217;t know how to operate a motor vehicle properly.<br />
Either way, for those who don&#8217;t own a car &#8211; or one that only goes a measly 220 km/h &#8211; racing simulations are a good way to vent their road rage. Alternatively you can shoot people in the mouth but since this blog is rated G let&#8217;s forget about the brain splattering for now and stick with the fucking cars. I welcome you to join me on a brief tour through the last 20 year of video gaming to see how far we&#8217;ve come.</p>
<p><strong>1988: Grand Prix Circuit</strong><br />
<img class="size-full wp-image-714 alignnone" style="margin: 10px;" src="http://www.n3rd.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/1988-gpc.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="200" />Simple but neat &#8211; 2D all the way. Its sister game <em>The Cycles: International Grand Prix Racing</em> incorporated hills and was thus 2½D, so to speak. Those were the first two racing games I remember playing, though I guess I did play something earlier on the C64 my dad used to bring home form work over the holidays.<br />
<br style="margin-bottom: 25px; clear: both;" /></p>
<p><strong>1989: Indianapolis 500</strong><br />
<img class="size-full wp-image-715" style="margin: 10px; float: right;" src="http://www.n3rd.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/1989-i500.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="200" />The infamous <em>Indy 500</em> was one of the first 3D racing games (for the PC anyway). It featured plain, untextured and unshaded polygon-based graphics, that&#8217;s oldschool right there. I think we were running it in CGA on our old <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_80286">80286</a> so it didn&#8217;t even look as fancy as it does in this picture. Reminds me of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LHX_Attack_Chopper">LHX Attack Chopper</a> which I used to play with my brother. Those were the days.<br style="margin-bottom: 25px; clear: both;" /></p>
<p><strong>1991: Formula One Grad Prix</strong><br />
<img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-716" style="margin: 10px;" src="http://www.n3rd.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/1991-f1gp.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="200" />I got <em>Formula One Grand Prix</em> sort of by accident because the game I really wanted was sold out (I can&#8217;t for the life of me remember what it was). Lucky me, because the critically acclaimed F1GP was in many respects a milestone. There hadn&#8217;t really been much improvement in the polygon department. Everything is a little more detailed but textures or shading were still largely absent.<br style="margin-bottom: 25px; clear: both;" /></p>
<p><strong>1994: The Need For Speed</strong><br />
<img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-717" style="margin: 10px;" src="http://www.n3rd.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/1994-nfs.jpg" alt="" width="540" height="405" />Having never actually played this game I am not going to comment too much on it. But as you can see, textures (albeit coarse) were commonplace by then, so we were finally getting somewhere. Everything still looks somewhat clunky, though. And yeah, from what I gather it <em>is</em> called <strong>The</strong> Need For Speed.<br style="margin-bottom: 25px; clear: both;" /></p>
<p><strong>1997: Need For Speed II SE</strong><br />
<img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-718" style="margin: 10px;" src="http://www.n3rd.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/1997-nfs2se.jpg" alt="" width="540" height="405" />Oh yeah, baby. My friends and I used to play <em>NFS2SE</em> for hours on end, round after round. With the rise of 3D hardware acceleration things like reflections and weather effects finally became a reality. On one particular track your windshield got plastered with bugs. Boy was that cool.<br style="margin-bottom: 25px; clear: both;" /></p>
<p><strong>2002: Collin McRae 3</strong><br />
<img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-747" style="margin: 10px;" src="http://www.n3rd.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/2002-cmc3.jpg" alt="" width="540" height="405" />Never played this one either. But the era of hardware <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%26l">T&amp;L</a> had long begun and you can see that photorealism finally seems to be within reach, the cars are already there for the most part. People actually look like people (in a racing game!), high resolution textures, the works. Now we&#8217;re talking. <br style="margin-bottom: 25px; clear: both;" /></p>
<p><strong>2005: Need For Speed: Most Wanted</strong><br />
<img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-750" style="margin: 10px;" src="http://www.n3rd.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/2005-nfs-mw.jpg" alt="" width="540" height="432" />My roomie is hooked on <em>NFS:MW</em> and despite its age it look fairly good. I would say we have gotten to the point where the environment is realistic enough not to constantly remind you that you&#8217;re in a lousy video game.<br style="margin-bottom: 25px; clear: both;" /></p>
<p><strong>2008: Need For Speed: Undercover</strong><br />
<img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-721" style="margin: 10px;" title="u" src="http://www.n3rd.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/2008-nfs-u.jpg" alt="" width="540" height="338" />As I&#8217;ve mentioned a few days ago, <em>NFS:UC</em> is my current guilty pleasure. While I can&#8217;t really pinpoint any major graphical improvements over Andrew&#8217;s NFS:MW, the overall impression is slightly better. I dare say that we have definitely reached a level of realism where under &#8220;racing conditions&#8221; you wouldn&#8217;t even notice any more details. In that regard racing games are unique and differ from say RPGs or first person shooters in that you don&#8217;t have time to actually inspect textures and such, simply because you move too fast and your attention is needed on the road.<br style="margin-bottom: 25px; clear: both;" /></p>
<p><strong>2011: ?</strong><br />
<img src="http://www.n3rd.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/2011-qm.png" alt="" title="" width="320" height="200" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-759" style="margin: 10px;" />What&#8217;s next? As far as pure graphics is concerned, I believe we are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymptote">asymptotically</a> approaching photorealism. Any major increase in computational power (read: better GPUs) will only marginally improve the visual appearance. There will be no more big leaps such as going from 2D to 3D or adding real-time reflections. Even resolution-wise we are pretty much at the limits, HD <a href="http://www.n3rd.org/2009/01/15/size-does-matter/">or beyond</a> should suffice for quite some time. Then again, predictions like that pretty much always turned out to be wrong.<br />
The money is in the details. Imagine realistically behaving gravel and sand, smoke or falling leaves vortexing around your car like they do a wind tunnel (particle systems, anyone?). Think about what could be done with more advanced AI, non-scripted autonomously interacting NPCs are just the start. Pedestrians diving for cover when you bomb down the promenade or other drivers flipping you off or throwing their Bud Light at you after you thwart them, buildings collapsing when you hit a supporting wall, fires spreading realistically&#8230; Now <em>that</em> would make driving fun again. There is plenty of room for improvement but you probably won&#8217;t see it from just looking at the screenshots any more.</p>
<p>I for one am not holding my breath for anything groundbreaking. Things progress slowly and sometimes they even move backwards: where the hell did my rear view mirror and my horn go in NFS:UC, for christ&#8217;s sake? It will probably be quite some time before we see any real improvements that truly go beyond simple cosmetics.</p>
<p class="n3-ps"><strong>Disclaimer:</strong> The first three images were taken from <a href="http://www.wikipedia.org">Wikipedia</a>, the rest from <a href="http://www.mobygames.com">MobyGames</a>. Most were scaled down to fit nicely on the page (check the MobyGames logo&#8217;s size).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n3rd.org/2009/01/22/adventures-in-fine-driving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Size does matter</title>
		<link>http://www.n3rd.org/2009/01/15/size-does-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.n3rd.org/2009/01/15/size-does-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>n3rd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n3rd.org/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes more really is more. Case in point: computer screens. Unless you do nothing but &#8220;office stuff&#8221; and watch YouTube you simply can&#8217;t have enough screen real estate, especially if you&#8217;re a developer. Any serious computer user who says that he wouldn&#8217;t prefer two or more screens over one any day of the week is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes more really is more. Case in point: computer screens. Unless you do nothing but &#8220;office stuff&#8221; and watch YouTube you simply can&#8217;t have enough screen real estate, especially if you&#8217;re a developer. Any serious computer user who says that he wouldn&#8217;t prefer two or more screens over one any day of the week is either lying or has never even tried it. But more on that in few days.<br />
A few months back I decided to get a new screen but just couldn&#8217;t make up my mind what to get. After weeks (seriously!) of weighing up the different options and their pros and cons I ended up buying a <a href="http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/products/Monitors/productdetail.aspx?c=us&amp;l=en&amp;s=dhs&amp;cs=19&amp;sku=223-4890">Dell 3008WFP</a>. Thirty decadent inches of awesomeness. (Yes, I need help. Shut it.)<br />
There are &#8211; believe it or not &#8211; actually a few practical arguments for getting a 30&#8243; monitor. First of all, it has a significant higher resolution compared to smaller ones. The step from 1920&#215;1200 to 2560&#215;1600 is <em>huge</em> &#8211; a difference of almost 80%. Compared to my 21&#8243; and 18&#8243; screen it&#8217;s more than twice and three times the resolution, respectively:<br />
<img style="margin: 10px;" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/screen-sizes.png" alt="" width="530" height="339" /><br />
Secondly, its sheer size is in some cases truly advantageous and not just a dick by proxy. While getting two 24&#8243; screens probably would have been more reasonable, cheaper and possibly more ergonomic, it&#8217;s obvious that watching movies is a job for the Big Gun. That damn thing is so insanely huge, it&#8217;s not even funny. You know how now matter what screen you buy you always get used to it eventually and everything feels like before? Not with this one you don&#8217;t, no Sir! I&#8217;ve had it for several months now and it still impresses the crap out of me.<br />
If you sit at an unhealthy distance of say 60 to 75cm (that&#8217;s 23.5 to 30 inches, you American SI heathens) it fills out most of your field of vision and you can really immerse in movies and games. Right now I&#8217;m playing <em>Need For Speed: Undercover</em> and holy god <em>damn</em> is that fun. With a surround sound system you can hear the cops behind you, you can hear the <em>swoooosh</em> when you pass another car and when you ram something you can actually feel it, thanks to the subwoofer. That&#8217;s an experience you can&#8217;t have with a small screen, no matter which way you spin it.<br />
<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/nfsu.jpg"><img style="margin: 10px;" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/nfsu-tn.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
That&#8217;s not a very exciting screenshot, I know that. Just click on it and view it in full size. If your browser shows scroll bars, you lose ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n3rd.org/2009/01/15/size-does-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Something old, something new</title>
		<link>http://www.n3rd.org/2008/12/11/something-old-something-new/</link>
		<comments>http://www.n3rd.org/2008/12/11/something-old-something-new/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>n3rd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n3rd.org/?p=609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a while since I got my new computer and so far I am really happy with it. It runs rock solid and is plenty fast for everything that I&#8217;m using it for. But what I&#8217;m most impressed with is not its speed, it&#8217;s how clean and organized its interior looks. My old PC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while since I got <a href="http://www.n3rd.org/2008/11/26/the-half-decade-overhaul/">my new computer</a> and so far I am really happy with it. It runs rock solid and is plenty fast for everything that I&#8217;m using it for. But what I&#8217;m most impressed with is not its speed, it&#8217;s how clean and organized its interior looks. My old PC was a bloody mess:<br />
<a href="http://www.n3rd.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/zaphod.jpg"><img alt="" src="http://www.n3rd.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/zaphod-tn.jpg" title="Zaphod" class="alignnone" width="500" height="375" style="padding: 10px 25px 10px 25px;"/></a><br />
Power cables all over the place and there isn&#8217;t really a whole lot you can do about it. So much for air flow. Now with the new one it&#8217;s a totally different story due to three main reasons:</p>
<ul class="n3-fix">
<li><strong>SATA</strong><br/>Fewer and much thinner cables. In terms of connectors IDE was a god damn nightmare.</li>
<li><strong>Cable Management</strong><br/>The case has several very helpful features that help keeping the clutter to a minimum. Most of the cables are stashed away nicely behind the motherboard tray.</li>
<li><strong>Modular PSU</strong><br/>This is just fantastic. Simply remove all the power cables that you don&#8217;t need and you don&#8217;t even have to bother with them in the first place. Totally worth the extra couple bucks.</li>
</ul>
<p>There&#8217;s admittedly a little less hardware in it (one HDD and DVD drive instead of two), but that wouldn&#8217;t have changed much. Compared to my old PC the new one is the Martha Stewart of computers, behold:<br />
<a href="http://www.n3rd.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/eccentrica.jpg"><img alt="" src="http://www.n3rd.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/eccentrica-tn.jpg" title="Eccentrica" class="alignnone" width="500" height="375" style="padding: 10px 25px 10px 25px;"/></a><br />
Another thing that surprised me a little was how <em>huge</em> everything has gotten. Take a look at the graphics card or the CPU heatsink, it&#8217;s easily twice the size of its predecessor. On the upside the fan runs at less then 1000 rpm at barely makes any noise at all, even if the processor operates under full load for hours. I was a little worried that the graphics card would be a little too noisy under &#8220;office conditions&#8221;, but it&#8217;s hardly noticeable. All in all it&#8217;s a really silent machine for the punch that it packs. Makes me a happy camper :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n3rd.org/2008/12/11/something-old-something-new/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The half-decade Overhaul</title>
		<link>http://www.n3rd.org/2008/11/26/the-half-decade-overhaul/</link>
		<comments>http://www.n3rd.org/2008/11/26/the-half-decade-overhaul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>n3rd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n3rd.org/?p=428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By outsiders the real geek is often thought of as someone who refers to his computer as his &#8220;baby&#8221;. I always found that rather offensive. I spend way more time with my computer than I ever would with a child! Oh wait&#8230; crap.
In any case, the &#8220;baby metaphor&#8221; never sounded right to me for in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By outsiders the real geek is often thought of as someone who refers to his computer as his &#8220;baby&#8221;. I always found that rather offensive. I spend way more time with my computer than I ever would with a child! Oh wait&#8230; crap.</p>
<p>In any case, the &#8220;baby metaphor&#8221; never sounded right to me for in real life you don&#8217;t have any say in what kind of kid you get. A geek on the other hand builds his or her (&#8230;okay, <em>his</em>) PC from the ground up. Each component is thoroughly researched and handpicked, from the casing down to the thermal paste. Nothing is left to chance. And yet, when you start it up for the first time&#8230; when the fans start to purr and the motherboard acknowledges your craftsmanship with a hearty <em>beep!</em>, one can&#8217;t help but feel a little like having given birth to something beautiful. That may sound strange to people who don&#8217;t share the passion but that&#8217;s okay. I never understood what&#8217;s so great about hitting a ball with a bat and running in a circle either.</p>
<p>So in that spirit I decided to finally replace my trusty old PC with something a little more up-to-date. It&#8217;s been over half a decade since I built it and in computer years that&#8217;s an eternity, so the upgrade is gonna feel massive. It&#8217;s like going from the wrinkles of Sigourney Weaver to the hotness of Rosario Dawson.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve picked:</p>
<ul class="n3-fix">
<li><strong>Mainboard:</strong><br/><a href="http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/Motherboard/Products_Overview.aspx?ProductID=2919">Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P</a></li>
<li><strong>Processor:</strong><br/><a href="http://www.intel.com/products/processor/core2duo/index.htm?iid=prod_desktopcore+body_core2duo">Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 (2x 3.0 GHz)</a></li>
<li><strong>Memory:</strong><br/><a href="http://newgskill.web-bi.net/bbs/view.php?id=g_ddr2&#038;page=1&#038;sn1=&#038;divpage=1&#038;category=3&#038;sn=off&#038;ss=on&#038;sc=on&#038;select_arrange=headnum&#038;desc=asc&#038;no=129">2x G.Skill 4GB DDR2-800 (CL4)</a></li>
<li><strong>Hard Drive:</strong><br/><a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?driveid=496">Western Digital VelociRaptor 150 GB</a></li>
<li><strong>Case:</strong><br/><a href="http://www.lian-li.com/v2/en/product/product06.php?pr_index=136&#038;cl_index=1&#038;sc_index=25&#038;ss_index=62">Lian Li PC-B25B</a></li>
<li><strong>Power Supply:</strong><br/><a href="http://h1124473.serverkompetenz.net/index.php?id=55&#038;cat=11&#038;subcat=189&#038;product=440&#038;L=1">Enermax MODU82+ 625W</a></li>
<li><strong>Graphics Card:</strong><br/><a href="http://www.evga.com/products/moreInfo.asp?pn=896-P3-1265-AR&#038;family=GeForce%20GTX%20200%20Series%20Family">eVGA GTX 260 Core 216</a></li>
<li><strong>Cooler:</strong><br/><a href="http://www.scythe-usa.com/product/cpu/035/sczp1000_detail.html">Scythe Zipang</a></li>
</ul>
<p>There isn&#8217;t really anything fancy (with the exception of the VelociRaptor maybe): no water cooling, no RAID, no SLI, no crazy overclocked CPU. It&#8217;s supposed to be a rock-solid yet silent workstation. I even considered just getting a cheap, passively cooled graphics card, but along came <a href="http://fallout.bethsoft.com/" title="Fallout 3 (Official Website)">Fallout 3</a> and that was the end of that. The GeForce 260 isn&#8217;t a particularly fast GPU by today&#8217;s standards but it (supposedly) generates way less heat than the 280 and is still plenty powerful for me.</p>
<p>So far I&#8217;ve only the casing and the CPU cooler in my hands, I expect the rest to arrive today or tomorrow the latest. I am going to take a couple of pictures (if I can convince my roommate to lend me his camera) and post them here so you can pretend to care. Giddy up, postman!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n3rd.org/2008/11/26/the-half-decade-overhaul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to keep a monitor from entering standby</title>
		<link>http://www.n3rd.org/2008/11/10/how-to-keep-a-monitor-from-entering-standby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.n3rd.org/2008/11/10/how-to-keep-a-monitor-from-entering-standby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>n3rd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n3rd.org/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s something stupid: using my Rumblepad doesn&#8217;t keep my monitors from going into standby. Playing old PlayStation games on ePSXe actually required me to move the mouse or hit the keyboard every so often which started to seriously piss me off after a while. A way to solve this once and for all was needed!
Manually [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s something stupid: using my <a href="http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/gaming/pc_gaming/gamepads/devices/264&#038;cl=us,en">Rumblepad</a> doesn&#8217;t keep my monitors from going into standby. Playing old PlayStation games on <a href="http://www.epsxe.com/">ePSXe</a> actually required me to move the mouse or hit the keyboard every so often which started to seriously piss me off after a while. A way to solve this once and for all was needed!</p>
<p>Manually disabling and re-enabling standby was for obvious reasons not an option, I had to find a way to automate this. Windows&#8217; power management supports different <em>Power Schemes</em>, so the idea was to just switch to a different one while ePSXe was running.</p>
<p>The first thing thing that needed to be done was to create a new profile with my desired settings, i.e with the monitors&#8217; standby set to <em>Never</em>. Apparently that can&#8217;t be done using the GUI (at least under XP, my 2003 Server has that feature), but a little research lead me to <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc748940.aspx"><code style="font-weight: bold">powercfg</code></a> which does the job, albeit via the command line:</p>
<pre class="n3_codebox">&gt; powercfg /create "NoMonitorStandby"</pre>
<p>That profile can then be edited with the standard GUI or you can do that from the console as well while you&#8217;re at it:</p>
<pre class="n3_codebox">&gt; powercfg /change "NoMonitorStandby" /monitor-timeout-dc 0</pre>
<p>You can of course just skip this whole part and use the provided <em>Always On</em> scheme if that works for you.</p>
<p>Once that&#8217;s taken care of, keeping the monitor from going into standby is simply a matter of switching to a different power profile, running the program, and then switching back using a batch file:</p>
<pre class="n3_codebox">&gt; powercfg /setactive "NoMonitorStandby"
&gt; epsxe.exe
&gt; powercfg /setactive "Home/Office Desk"</pre>
<p>Unfortunately, <code style="font-weight: bold">powercfg</code> requires elevated privileges. In other words: the above script won&#8217;t work if you&#8217;re logged on with a restricted account (which you should be). There&#8217;s probably a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_Policy">Group Policy</a> that handles this, but since the program I wanted to run required Administrator privileges anyway I didn&#8217;t bother looking into it. I&#8217;m just a lazy fucker like that.</p>
<p>Anyway, as it turns out you can&#8217;t use your trusted old <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb490994.aspx"><code style="font-weight: bold;">runas</code></a> to start a batch file with elevated privileges (and I assume there is a good reason for this). But not to worry, <a href="http://www.joeware.net/freetools/tools/cpau/">CPAU</a> is your friend. It&#8217;s a tiny, simple <code style="font-weight: bold;">runas</code> replacement that even allows you to pass the password along to the command line so you don&#8217;t have to type it in every time. It goes without saying that this should not be done in our case since we&#8217;re using the Administrator account. Storing a plain text password in an unencrypted text file is a bad idea™.</p>
<p>Assuming our profile-switcher is called <code>epsxe.bat</code>, all you have to do now is call CPAU with the appropriate parameters:</p>
<pre class="n3_codebox">&gt; cpau -u Administrator -ex epsxe.bat -wait -profile</pre>
<p>The <code>-profile</code> option is crucial: if it is omitted the user profile is not loaded and the system won&#8217;t find our shiny new power scheme.</p>
<p>There are of course many other ways to go about this, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Script_Host">Windows Scripting Host</a> comes to mind (and there are probably third party applications that can do the job as well). But I wanted something simple and lightweight, so that&#8217;s what I went with.</p>
<p>By the way, does anyone know if it is possible to set independent standby timeouts for different monitors and/or graphic adapters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n3rd.org/2008/11/10/how-to-keep-a-monitor-from-entering-standby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
